Wednesday, December 7, 2011

Behind the Boils



Behind the Boils

A perspective of Bukoski's Ham on Rye By: Matthew Dobson

      In a world of bright and shiny, picture perfect people, there are bound to be many individuals

who are smarter, richer, and more successful than us. One point Mr. Bukowski makes
consistently throughout "Ham on Rye," is that no matter how untouchable, classy, or perfect a
person may seem, they will at some point be squatting over, squeezing shit from their asshole.
Bukowski proves not only that we are all human, and playing the same futile game, but that in
this maniacally pointless parade we call life, nothing is sacred. Almost by accident, through the
realization that in the world of Henry Chinaski nothing is special, the reader becomes
increasingly aware that everything is.
     Throughout the story, situations and metaphors help construct the extreme alienation
of our Henry as a social outcast. Though the reader may not be an outsider to society,
everyone has felt at least some degree of isolation, which makes Henry's horrendously lonely
state of being quite identifiable. While experiencing life through the eyes of such a tragic
hero, there is an overwhelming desire to root for Henry. Henry Chinaski's survival somehow
represents our struggle, however different it may be, to endure within a hostile environment.

The first blow inflicted more shock than pain. The second hurt more.
Each blow which followed increased the pain. At first I was aware of the walls,
the toilet, the tub. Finally I couldn't see anything. As he beat me, he berated me,
but I couldn't understand the words. I thought about his roses in the yard. I
thought about his automobile in the garage. I tried not to scream. I knew that if I
did scream he might stop, but knowing this, and knowing his desire for me to
scream, prevented me.

      Each time Henry survives one of his father's sadistic beatings, there is a dark spiritual
cleansing in the reader. Henry's ability to endure such atrocities grows as he becomes
increasingly resilient, and we grow with him, experiencing catharsis the whole way.
      Henry develops a horrible skin condition which covers much of his body with boils and
scars. This is a very physical representation of his separation from the accepted. Like  
the lepers of biblical days, Henry feels like an outcast more than ever. Here author Ernest
Fontana very elegantly sums up the meaning of these boils and scars.

                        Bukowski extrapolates Henry's acne into a powerful metaphor for his
isolation from the mythic California of the American Dream, which Kevin Star
identifies as charged with human hope, as linked imaginatively with the most
compelling of American myths, the pursuit of happiness. Because of his incurable
acne, Chinaski is never permitted this illusory hope.

       It is Henry's crushing lack of hope, which will leave readers grateful for the hopes
and dreams they do possess. Henry is so ashamed and alienated that he fantasizes about solitude.
When Henry's face is covered in bandages, it gives him a brief sense of power. No longer a
specific sad person with a horrible ailment, he is now an anonymous,
bandaged super villain.
I looked into the mirror. It was great. My whole head was bandaged. I was all
white. Nothing could be seen but my eyes, my mouth, and my ears, and some
tufts of hair sticking up at the top of my head. I was hidden. It was wonderful. I
stood and lit a cigarette and glanced about the lobby. Some in-patients were
sitting about reading magazines and newspapers. I felt very exceptional and a bit
evil.
        This concept is relatable by all. There is always some degree of personal imprisonment,
which anonymity can release. It is much like a socially awkward teen who is “cool” within the
online community, or an amputee stuck in bed  who finds a disability-free escape in an online
video game.   
         Henry's consistently hard-knock life leaves him with some bitter attitude toward people
that are happy. Henry’s thoughts on religion are clearly influenced by his circumstance. There is
no doubt the following quote is Bukowski’s own personal feeling toward religion. “I had 


decided against religion a couple of years back. If it were true, it made fools out of people, or 


it drew fools. And if it weren’t true, the fools were all the more foolish.”
          Although Henry is dark and cynical about many things, there are several circumstances
where he encounters or creates something that he believes in. In these brief fleeting moments we
see the inspiration and light which contributed to the incredible body of work he would later
accomplish. That is if we are assuming Henry Chinaski is in fact Bukowski himself, which I feel
safe in doing. There is a certain air of honesty which can only be felt when something is true.
Here are some of Henry’s thoughts on his earliest writing.
The Baron went on doing magical things. Half the notebook was filled with 

Baron Von Himmlen. It made me feel good to write about the Baron. A man 

needed somebody. There wasn’t anybody around, so you had to make up 

somebody, make him up to be like a man should be. It wasn’t make-believe 

or cheating. The other way was make believe and cheating: living your life 

without a man like him around.
          The statement “living your life without a man like him around,” is very likely referencing
Henry’s own sense of feeling cheated, and having no real male role model, or any role model. It
is in these moments when Henry actually experiences the happiness of creation, that we see there
is a chance for him to have a soul. Despite impossible odds, Henry creates truth within a world

of shit. It is pleasing to see that Henry is able to be moved by literature, again a glimpse into the
mind of Bukowski himself.
Turgenev was a very serious fellow but he could make me laugh because a truth
first encountered can be very funny. When someone else’s truth is the same as
your truth, and he seems to be saying it just for you, that’s great. I read my books
at night, like that, under the quilt with the overheated reading lamp. Reading all
those good lines while suffocating. It was magic.
          Regarding the many social limitations within which Henry and his family are living, there
are several metaphors.  A key one is an encounter toward the beginning of the book during one
of the family outings in the old Model T. Ernest Fontana describes it in his criticism on Ham On
Rye:
Many of these characteristics are evident in Bukowski’s most recent novel Ham
on Rye (1983) The two extreme geographical limits of this bildungsroman are the
orange groves of the San Bernardino foothills and the beach at Venice. Both
function as illusory paradisal loci in which Henry Chinaski is presented as an
intruder. As a child, Chinaski accompanied his immigrant parents on excursions
in their Model-T through the San Bernardino foothills where they enjoyed
picnicking amid miles and miles of orange trees always either in blossom or full
of oranges. One Sunday, Chinaski’s father leads the family into the groves to 

pick oranges. The owner of the grove discovers them and, brandishing a shot 

gun, expels them: “I’m the law here. Now move.” He forces the Chinaskis to 

leave behind the oranges they picked and warns them not to return. “Or next 

time it might not go so easy for you.” This episode defines the territorial and 

social limits that Chinaski and his family are confined to. The paradisal 

abundance of Southern California is forbidden them, and Chinaski’s father, 

who loses his job as a milkman during the depression, becomes an increasingly 

embittered, frightend, and tyrannical father.
          This is a particularly meaningful metaphor. There are beautiful orange blossoms all
around, yielding so much fruit, that it could never all be used. Yet despite the abundance, the
extremely close proximity, and the beauty, the fruit itself is untouchable. So right from his youth
Henry’s education in being an outsider is perpetuated by situations like these.
          Consistently we see a world portrayed which Henry Chinaski cannot be a part of. Due to
his disfigurement, his economic class, and the many harsh years which have turned his view of
people sour, Henry cannot take part in the world around him.  On a trip to the beach with his
friend Jimmy, his acne prevented Henry from socializing. Here are his thoughts as he watched
Jimmy hanging out with a few girls on the beach.
Jim was splashing water on the girls. He was the water God and they loved him.
He was the possibility and the promise. He was great. He knew how to do it. I 


had read many books but he had read a book that I had never read. He was an 


artist with his little pair of bathing trunks and his balls and his wicked little look 


and his round ears. He was the best. I couldn’t challenge him anymore than I 


could have challenged that big son-of-a-bitch in the green coupe with the 


looker whose hair flowed in the wind. They both had got what they deserved. 


I was just a 50-cent turd floating around in the green ocean of life.
          Much like Jesus, Henry Chinaski suffers so we don’t have to. It is very easy to feel sorry
for Henry, and in these moments it is also easy to feel good that we don’t have to bare his full
burden. We all are, however, caught in the Henry Chinaski cycle to some degree, and it would 


do well to remember not to let circumstance cut us off from the light. There is always a million
reasons to feel inferior or left out, but if we remember the lessons from the literary greats we
don’t ever have to. Henry Chinaski alienated himself that day on the beach, because of his
perceived shortcomings, and in his crucifixion, our shortcomings are forgiven. We can enjoy

the day despite the reasons not to.
        Another recurring metaphor is the spider, it’s web, and the flies caught in them.  Henry 


is undoubtedly caught in the web of circumstance, and there are many venomous spiders in his
world. Henry learns quickly that the only way to survive is to crush them. Fontana addresses


this in his review:

One of the recurrent motifs in Ham on Rye is that of the spider and the fly.
Henry’s adversaries, from his father and the bullies of his childhood to Jimmy
Newhall and the English teacher at Los Angeles City College who makes the
class recite Gilbert and Sullivan lyrics to improve their diction, are the spiders.
The spider web becomes the metaphor for the depressed working class Los
Angeles of Henry’s childhood, a region of failed hopes and petty tyranny.
Although Henry cannot fully extricate himself from this web, he comes to realize
that the fly does not have to accept passively the role of the spider’s victim.

          It is great when Henry decides not to be the victim, and stands up for himself. Having 


been perpetually beaten on mentally and physically from childhood, he becomes stronger and 


stronger as he grows up. This strength and resilience manifests itself in an extraordinary way 


during the last beating Henry’s father gives him.
“Let’s go,” said my father, and I walked into the bathroom. He got the strop
down. “Take down your pants and shorts,” he said. I didn’t do it. He reached in


front of me, yanked my belt open, unbuttoned me and yanked my pants down. 
He pulled down my shorts. The strop landed.  It was the same, the same 


explosive sound, the same pain. “You’re going to kill your mother!” he 


screamed. He hit me again. But the tears weren’t coming. My eyes were 


strangely dry. I thought about killing him. That there must be a way to kill 


him. In a couple of years I could beat him to death. But I wanted him now. 


He wasn’t much of anything. I must have been adopted. He hit me again. 


The pain was still there but the fear of it was gone. The strop landed again.

The room no longer blurred. I could see everything clearly. My father 


seemed to sense the difference in me and he began to lash me harder, again 


and again, but the more he beat me the less I felt. It was almost as if he was 


the one who was helpless. Something had occurred, something had changed. 


My father stopped, puffing, and I heard him hanging up the strop. He walked 


to the door. I turned. “Hey,” I said. My father turned and looked at me. 


“Give me a couple more,” I told him, “if it makes you feel any better.”
          At the point in the story where this final parental beating occurs, Henry is only in Jr. High.
This is a fairly young age to be standing up to, and capable of overpowering the biggest 


directing force in life. Although Henry is still blind to the nature of the world, his ability to 


confront fear is exceptional. This natural inclination to survive in spite of un-survivable 


conditions, is what keeps Henry from suicide, and eventually must have helped him write 


his first great works.
          Finally, toward the end of the book we come upon a passage written not by the innocent
little Henry Chinaski, who is the victim of fate and circumstance, but by the Henry who has
undergone a dynamic change. Still not quite the epitome of virtue, there is no doubt that Mr.
Chinaski has undergone one of the most hellish journeys from Innocence to Experience ever
endured. The major issues in literature: love, blood, sex, death, and money, Chinaski was beaten
and bruised by all of them. Here we see his summed up version of the world.
I quickly became disenchanted with military proceedings. The others shined their
shoes brightly and seemed to go through maneuvers with relish. I couldn’t see
myself crouched down in a football helmet, shoulder pads laced on, decked out in
blue and white, #69, trying to block some mean son-of-a-bitch from across town,
trying to move out some brute with tacos on his breath so that the son of the
district attorney could slant off left tackle for six yards. The problem was you had
to keep choosing between one evil or another, and no matter what you chose, 


they sliced a little more off you, until there was nothing left. At the age of 25 


most people were finished. A whole god-damned nation of assholes driving
automobiles, eating, having babies, doing everything in the worst way possible,
like voting for the presidential candidate who reminded them most of themselves.
          While Ham on Rye leaves Henry’s future uncertain, history does not. During the worst 


and most torturous moments of Henry’s life, the reader should remember the character is based 


more than loosely on Charles Bukowski. So despite the violent and belligerently psychotic 


behavior, and alcoholism and a complete unacceptability, Mr. Bukowki found a way to not only
fit in, but to become a fond and cherished memory among millions of literature fans. This
coming of age story, as horrendous as it is, rests infinitely more identifiable than other more cute
and shiny such stories. The tormented soul of Henry Chinaski lives on to write another page, and
so must we live through adversity toward our own destinies.
          Ham on Rye portrays a view of a world not glimmering with opportunity, or ripe with
possibility, but drowning in the untouchable dreams of broken men. It is in his ability to relish
such desolate corners of forsaken America, that Henry Chinaski ultimately finds his voice.
In each encounter with Henry’s dismal world, a magical thing happens in the reader’s world
outside the book. Juxtaposed against this condemned man in a dark and hopeless 1920’s L.A.,
the reader’s own world will shine with promise. This appreciation for the simplest things in life
can only be gained by reading literary greats like Bukowski, or by taking the circumstantial
journey to Desolation Row for one’s self.



They’re selling postcards of the hanging
They’re painting the passports brown
The beauty parlor is filled with sailors
The circus is in town
Here comes the blind commissioner
They’ve got him in a trance
One hand is tied to the tight-rope walker
The other is in his pants
And the riot squad they’re restless
They need somewhere to go
As Lady and I look out tonight
From Desolation Row
(Bob Dylan)



I remember you well in the Chelsea Hotel
you were famous, your heart was a legend.
You told me again you preferred handsome men
but for me you would make an exception.
And clenching your fist for the ones like us
who are oppressed by the figures of beauty,
you fixed yourself, you said, "Well never mind,
we are ugly but we have the music."
(Leonard Cohen)
References:

Ham on Rye (1983) by Charles Bukowski
Bukowski’s Ham on Rye and the Los Angeles Novel  - A literary criticism by Ernest Fontana
Bob Dylan – Lyrics from Desolation Row
Leonard Cohen – Poetry from Chelsea Hotel

Although not quoted these books, web archives, and authors proved indispensable to my research:
Ham on Rye By: Meanor, Patrick, Magill’s Survey of American Literature, Revised Edition
Charles Bukowski By: Boyle, William, Critical Survey of Long Fiction, Fourth Edition
LiteratureA Portable Anthology, Second Edition, By: Gardner, Lawn, Ridl, Schakel

*Finally a special thanks to the Professor Great, David Johansson, whom without I would be exponentially more oblivious to such important literary catalysts as love, blood, sex, death, and money.* 

Saturday, October 29, 2011

The Tea Party: Making Evil Fun


Wednesday, October 26, 2011

I am the 1%




Wednesday, October 12, 2011

“Compare’n Yo Ass to Fat Rocks of Crack” A variation of Shakespeare by Matthew Dobson

Any Shakespeare fans? This is a very famous poem of his:

Shall I compare thee to a summer's day?
Thou art more lovely and more temperate;
Rough winds do shake the darling buds of May,
And summer's lease hath all too short a date;
Sometime too hot the eye of heaven shines,
And often is his gold complexion dimm'd;
And every fair from fair sometime declines,
By chance or nature's changing course untrimm'd;
But thy eternal summer shall not fade,
Nor lose possession of that fair thou ow'st;
Nor shall Death brag thou wander'st in his shade,
When in eternal lines to time thou grow'st:
So long as men can breathe or eyes can see,
So long lives this, and this gives life to thee.

For my ENC1102 class we were told to rewrite it with a modern twist:

“Compare’n Yo Ass to Fat Rocks of Crack”

Compare’n yo ass to fat rocks of crack
You be bigga and don’t burn up so quick
Them boulders will give ya a heart attack
Smoke that shit it only lasts two minutes
Sometimes that glass pipe will burn up yo lips
And that high be gone before I’m finished
Then I’m left on the floor in little bits
Rocks found in the carpets my only wish
Now Yo high that shit be lastin all day
One hit of Yo ass is all it’s taken
Never even close to goin away
This high might last forever no faken
If my heart is even slightly beat’n
Ima smoke Yo ass without retreating

I even stayed true to the iambic pentameter and rhyme sceme.
I hope my teacher digs it.

Sunday, October 9, 2011

"Guardians of Balance" A research paper by Matthew Dobson


Guardians of Balance
         Our world is a constantly evolving balance of life and complexity. Each organism, from people, down to the smallest amoeba, have a profound effect and purpose. It could be theorized that life itself knows what it needs to flourish, and tries to steer itself there, through evolution and adaptation. Self-aware, life acts as one coherent entity, manifesting itself in various abnormalities and mutations. These changes would seem to be with one purpose: to preserve and strengthen life.  Yet among these “life preserving” phenomena, are some which seem counterintuitive.  Homosexuality would seemingly go against the rules of evolution. However, to think that there is no purpose for such a thing would be to greatly underestimate the deliberate nature of life.
         A perfect example of life’s intentional preservation is the baby boomer generation. After the Vietnam War, many American men lost their lives. The remaining men came home and began conceiving in record numbers. What is usually a perfect 50/50 male to female birth rate, adjusted itself to make up for the men who had died. The “will” of our species adjusted the birth ratio in order to preserve our delicate balance. In an article from The University College London, Anthropology Department:       
“There is a large literature on the evolution of sex ratio. Darwinian Theory predicts that the sex ratio of reproductive adults will be close to 50:50 if the costs of producing males and females are similar. Because every member of any sexually reproducing population has one mother and one father, the average reproductive success of males and females is always equal. If one sex becomes more numerous than the other, then a parent producing offspring of the rarer sex will leave more grandchildren. Hence strong selection pulls sex ratio back towards 50:50.” (Mace, Jordan, Holden, 2003)
         It can be definitively said that humanity in general can sense an upset in the balance of the male to female ratio, and adjust accordingly. Humanity may also sense other problematic aspects, and try to help. Such as an over populated earth, or many children growing up without the guidance of parents. Homosexuality has been documented since mankind began writing things down. The idea that the ratio at which human beings are born homosexual, is directly related to our ability to provide for our offspring, is not an outlandish one. In order to explore it we must assume that homosexuality is an inborn trait and not a choice.
         “There is no evidence to suggest that the sexuality of the majority of people, homosexual or heterosexual, is a result of a conscious choice on their part. Despite the frequently heard popular assertations that homosexuality is a choice (De Witt, 1992), the overwhelming majority of homosexual males and females indicate they never chose to become homosexual, but that they are that way innately (SteveD41, 1993, "Evidence"; GregBear, 1993). Those who would dismiss this point make the untenable mistake of believing in synchronized mass dishonesty, rather than accepting the stated feelings of homosexuals as indicators of (at least partially) natural biological drives. (Preston Hunter 1993)
         All human beings are born with sexual preferences. Many heterosexual men are attracted to women with certain features. Tall woman short woman, whatever it is, it is. Woman often have very specific traits which they are attracted to as well. If a person is sexually aroused by a certain characteristic, it happens naturally. We are simply attracted to certain things, and are simply not attracted to others. There is no choice. Homosexuality may eventually be viewed the same way. It will take time, however, for intellect and logic to break through the walls that generations of ignorance so diligently built.
         Even more than just a naturally inborn attraction to the same sex, homosexuality may be a balance to an otherwise off balance world. With many populations growing beyond their means, and many children suffering from poor resources, homosexuality could offer relief. This relief is quite possibly not visible in the span of one lifetime, but over thousands of years homosexuality could be just the buffer evolution needs to provide for our offspring. It is difficult to speculate the reason behind the existence of homosexuality. Though there are many possibilities. In an article in the Huffington Post, author G. Roger Denson writes:
         “A priest I know to be a self-affirmed heterosexual recently engaged me in a debate on the merits of heterosexuality vs. homosexuality. The conversation went something like this: "Procreation, Mr. Denson, is a creative force. Those who bring life into the world are vital." "And those who secure life's essential balance, Father ... they are crucial." "How do homosexuals secure the species, Mr. Denson. I mean as sexual beings?" "We preserve the species. We are conservation realized. We provide nature's ... restraint ... on your procreative extravagance. We keep your production from becoming ...overproduction ... pollution ... destruction unbridled. We keep you from becoming ... an obscene cosmic joke."
         These elegantly stated words sum up the idea perfectly. Homosexuality exists with a purpose. This essential purpose could be to balance the children and the lack of adults who are supposed to raise them. Raise them to survive and preserve the species. It could clearly be argued that this is not happening as it is supposed to, and that our species has taken actions to correct it.
         This theory can also be confirmed by evolution itself. Evolution over thousands and millions of years weeds out or strengthens characteristics that are harmful or beneficial to life. If homosexuality was harmful to the preservation of humanity, then it would have evolved out ages ago. Rather it is more apparent than ever, giving credibility to the notion that it serves a purpose to our species.
         “While evolution is the foundational force of biology, sex is the mortar that holds that foundation together. So advantageous is sex that despite the high biological cost of sex most macroscopic animals, including 99% of all vertebrates, reproduce sexually (Sites, 1993).  It is because sexual reproduction is so indispensable and so zealously selected for that the existence of homosexuality is a paradox. Homosexuality would seem to be the antithesis of sexual reproduction, the enemy of evolution. One must wonder: why wouldn't evolution quickly select against behavior which diverts an animal from sex and reproduction?  Yet despite seeming unlikelihood homosexuality does exist. Moreover, homosexuality is more than an insignificant quirk in one or two animal species and a social aberration in humans. It is widespread in animals.” (Hunter, 1994)
         So here we have a phenomena which crosses all cultures, races, ethnicities, and even species. An effect which has existed for thousands of years, continues to grow and develop. Homosexuality is apparent throughout the animal kingdom from fish all the way up to the largest mammals. 
       “In modern times the scientific community has observed and thus become aware of widespread non-human homosexuality. Animals from "throughout the animal kingdom" have been observed engaged in same-sex courting and same-sex copulation (Alcock, 1989, p. 525) and "apparent homosexual behavior increases as we ascent the taxonomic tree toward mammals" (Denniston, 1980) and then towards primates. “(Hunter, 1994) 
       Clearly documented and widely apparent, homosexuality is an obvious natural occurrence. To disregard such a global and cross species effect would be naïve to say the least.  So the question is not: Is homosexuality an important effect which has a purpose?  But rather: What is the important purpose of homosexuality in our species?  As it clearly has one. As does every part of our world have a purpose, no matter how small or how seemingly unimportant. Yet some occurrences, like homosexuality, are particularly difficult for mainstream society to see the benefit in. This is due to cultural and religious prejudices, which have historically hindered education and understanding significantly. To bypass fear and to attempt to see a purpose is to attempt to find knowledge. Finding the evolutionary purpose of homosexuality is a widely researched topic among biologists. From trying to find a “gay gene” (which no one has come close to doing) to simply explaining the existence of same sex attraction, it is an important field of study.
        “ Many evolutionary biologists have wrestled with the widespread presence of homosexuality in human populations. Essentially, their quandary is not that homosexuality is present in large numbers     (2-3% at most in any population), but that it is found in virtually all cultures and societies at least to some degree. Evolutionarily, this implies that there is some evolutionary benefit and some genetic component, which usually means it contributes to survival and reproductive success in some way. But how can that be when homosexuals reproduce at a far lesser rate than heterosexuals? The original sociobiologist, E. O. Wilson, stated the problem this way: "The homosexual state itself results in inferior genetic fitness; because of course homosexual men marry much less frequently and have far fewer children than their unambiguously heterosexual counterparts. Homosexuals may gain a genetic fitness by being primarily helpers in raising offspring of their brothers and sisters, therefore preserving their own genes through aiding the survival of their nieces and nephews who carry about 1/8 of their own genes (technically referred to as kin selection). Aiding the survival of eight or more such nieces and nephews preserves a full complement of your genes into the next generation which is how natural selection supposedly works.” (Bohlin, Probe Ministries)
         Making some members of society less likely to bare their own children, and more likely to help improve the life of another’s children, seems like an efficient plan. If I were life, and was brain-storming a way to achieve this, homosexuality would be an elegant solution. Given the current circumstances and the state much of the world is in, it is within reason to think we could use all the help we can get. With its historical precedent, and its current vast presence, it seems homosexuality is here to stay. Whether it serves a purpose in our society is hardly debatable. The hard part is rummaging through the many positive effects which homosexually born individuals most definitely provide for humanity.
         When we gaze at the cultural happenings and observe the routines of nature, it is astonishing how well everything works together. Each human life is but a mere second in the span of millennia. To think we could decide that a certain trait is unnatural or immoral would be to glorify our ignorance. The ultimate plan of evolution only becomes visible in retrospect. As a society we benefit from many seemingly insignificant or even seemingly harmful things. It is through unbiased research that we may one day comprehend just how vital each intricacy actually is. Homosexuality is one of these ever important intricacies and its importance will grow with its numbers.
       
 (It is not the intention of the author to cast any judgment on or to scientifically reduce a sexual orientation to a sterile equation. This is written only in an attempt to bring understanding to a massive cultural phenomena which deserves proper recognition.)           
Work Cited:
Testing evolutionary hypotheses about human biological adaptation using cross-cultural comparison Ruth Mace*, Fiona Jordan, Clare Holden Department of Anthropology, University College London, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT, UK


Homosexuality: A Paradox of Evolution - By Preston Hunter, 1994.

Can't Homosexuality Be Seen as Population Control? Ray Bohlin, Probe Ministries

Homosexuality as population control? Nature’s restraint on procreative extravagance.
G. Roger Denson.Critic, essayist and cultural nomad Posted: November 17, 2010 12:34 PM
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/g-roger-denson/is-homosexuality-populati_b_784449.html

 
Powered by Blogger | Printable Coupons